The Judging Process Explained
The Global Undergraduate Awards Programme brings together leading academics from around the world to evaluate and recognise outstanding student work. Through a rigorous and impartial judging process, entries are carefully assessed across four stages, ensuring that the most deserving submissions receive the recognition they deserve.
Volunteer judges have been recruited from universities, institutions and industry all over the world. These leading global academics volunteer their time and expertise to score and comment on students’ entries during the judging process. Each category has an international panel of judges, these judges are experts in their field of research and have a vast range of academic backgrounds. Judges from various regions of the globe volunteer their time to review the entries each year.
Judging is divided into 4 stages across four months. With the volume of entries received we need to give our judges enough time to consider the entries fairly. Each stage involves increasingly detailed analysis of the entries. Each category panel has a unique set of judging guidelines. These guidelines were created in collaboration with previous judges and current sitting judges. Leading academics and industry experts in each category field have been consulted on how best to judge the entries in that category. Guidelines allow each judging panel to establish what makes for winning entries in that category and ensure that all our judges within a category are making consistent grading decisions.
The entire judging process is completely impartial. Not only are the entries anonymous but judges cannot see other judges’ scores or feedback until the final discussions. GUA’s anonymity requirements allow entries to be considered based on their own merits, without any biases. This allows all entries to live up to their full potential.
Stage 0: Screening
Entries are screened before judges ever receive them. Screening involves making sure that all entries meet the GUA’s anonymity guidelines and their category-dependent word counts. This is why we remind students of the anonymity and word count requirements because if these requirements are not met the papers are disqualified.
Stage 1: Competitive, qualifying stage
From late June to early July, is a competitive, qualifying stage. Judges choose which entries will progress further into the competition. This stage relies heavily on judge consensus and entries are only progressed based on a majority. Judges are mindful of entry structure, presentation and argumentation at this stage, with particular attention paid to abstracts or artist statements.
Stage 2: comparative stage
Entries then move into Stage 2, which is a comparative stage in July. The judges use comparative scores to decide which entries are the best in their category. Judges numerically rank entries and the top entries are decided based on the entire panels’ scores. Judges focus their attention on the academic rigour of Stage 2 entries. The top bracket of entries in a category is decided in this stage and these entries progress onwards to Stage 3.
Stage 3: Scoring Stage
This stage involves judges giving scores based on the category’s guidelines. Stage 3 lasts most of August, as our volunteer Judges also give written feedback on the criteria that they score. Judges really sink their teeth into all of the entries that make it into this stage. All judges on a category panel review all the entries that make it into this stage. Entries in Stage 3 are strong pieces of academic work, and judges focus on scoring and commenting on category-specific criteria. The scoring criteria at this stage considers every aspect of the entry, from language and technique to intellectual insight and publish-ability. This is the stage in which the top 10% of entries are identified. These top 10% of entries are our Highly Commended.
Stage 4: Qualitative Stage
In early September, the Global Winner for each category is decided. Category Chair judges decide how many entries are to be considered in the final stage. Only a handful of entries get to Stage 4 and they are all high-quality pieces of undergraduate academic work. The Global Winner is decided during a qualitative discussion undertaken by the entire judging panel.
Stage 4: Qualitative Stage
In early September, the Global Winner for each category is decided. Category Chair judges decide how many entries are to be considered in the final stage. Only a handful of entries get to Stage 4 and they are all high-quality pieces of undergraduate academic work. The Global Winner is decided during a qualitative discussion undertaken by the entire judging panel.
